Submitted a bug report, but figured I'd also mention this here.
The way Reflexive Channeling currently works, you get all required channels opened, even if you only need a subset of them. This can lead to over-channeling if you already have one channel open, but not the other, since another instance of the first will be opened unnecessarily.
For example, if I only intend on opening a single sorcery channel and go into battle with one open, reflexive channeling will open a second one alongside the cryomancy channel needed for the cryosorcerous disk, leaving me with two sorcery, one cryomancy.
Could it be made such that the currently-open channels are taken into account when opening the channels needed for reflexive abilities?
Alternatively or additionally, it would be nice to have a way to release a single channel rather than having to release everything and reopen everything just to drop one channel or change one element for another.
More discerning reflexes
Re: More discerning reflexes
Good suggestion. As a quick aside, however, if you specify the channel type, you can actually release individual channels. For example, release sor or release cryo
You declaratively shout, "frack Corvus. Support Shadgardians."
Zeldryn nods simply, that said, folding his arms back beneath a striated fiery-orange wool poncho.
Several townsfolk cheer in response to Zeldryn's shout!
Zeldryn nods simply, that said, folding his arms back beneath a striated fiery-orange wool poncho.
Several townsfolk cheer in response to Zeldryn's shout!
Re: More discerning reflexes
Can you give me any further details of the situation you're seeing this behavior in? In my testing, I see it already working as requested: If I have cryo open already and get attacked, only a sorcery channel is opened. If I have sorcery open already and get attacked, only a cryo channel is opened.jerc wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 6:12 am The way Reflexive Channeling currently works, you get all required channels opened, even if you only need a subset of them. [...] Could it be made such that the currently-open channels are taken into account when opening the channels needed for reflexive abilities?
As Zeldryn pointed out, you can specify if you want to release only a specific channel, such as RELEASE CRYOMANCY or RELEASE SORCERY. These can also be abbreviated, such as REL C or REL S.Alternatively or additionally, it would be nice to have a way to release a single channel rather than having to release everything and reopen everything just to drop one channel or change one element for another.
[#GMCHAT] <Mirazia> I think you're enjoying this [mighty winter stuff] more than you realised
[#GMCHAT] <Rias> I AM AND IF THAT'S WRONG I DON'T WANT TO BE RIGHT
[#GMCHAT] <Rias> I AM AND IF THAT'S WRONG I DON'T WANT TO BE RIGHT
Re: More discerning reflexes
The way I see it work is if I'm channeling 3 channels in elemancy, it'll try to channel a fourth causing the unable to channel message every time. Also, if I want to channel something other than geomancy, it'll open a channel regardless of what I have open already.
Re: More discerning reflexes
These are both intentional. If you already have three channels open and none of them can be used to conjure the blocking matter, you won't be able to open a fourth because of the three-channel limit. If you don't want to automatically open a geomancy channel for defense because it'll mess up your current elements you're already channeling, you should probably disable the ability via ABILITY DISABLE.verel wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:33 am The way I see it work is if I'm channeling 3 channels in elemancy, it'll try to channel a fourth causing the unable to channel message every time. Also, if I want to channel something other than geomancy, it'll open a channel regardless of what I have open already.
For elemancers, these are meant to be of use primarily to those who are already regularly utilizing the associated elements. Aeromancers, pyromancers, and non-master hydromancers who don't plan to regularly weave geo into their spells probably will want to avoid these abilities and find some other kind of defense if they find that the automatic opening of geomancy for defense is messing up their spells.
[#GMCHAT] <Mirazia> I think you're enjoying this [mighty winter stuff] more than you realised
[#GMCHAT] <Rias> I AM AND IF THAT'S WRONG I DON'T WANT TO BE RIGHT
[#GMCHAT] <Rias> I AM AND IF THAT'S WRONG I DON'T WANT TO BE RIGHT
Re: More discerning reflexes
Hmm, it does seem to work that way now that I sit down and test it intentionally! Could be a race condition in my brain or fingers 😛 I'll keep an eye out for any more evidence of it misbehaving.Rias wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:29 am Can you give me any further details of the situation you're seeing this behavior in? In my testing, I see it already working as requested: If I have cryo open already and get attacked, only a sorcery channel is opened. If I have sorcery open already and get attacked, only a cryo channel is opened.
Also, totally forgot about release taking a channel type argument. Could probably use a mention in the ability descriptions for cryomancy, sorcery, etc.