Page 1 of 1
command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Sat May 09, 2015 9:12 am
by sona
I just think this would be an extremely useful command, if we can have it. We all know the pain of trying to eyeball a container with 100 different items. #firstworldArtisanProblems
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Sat May 09, 2015 10:22 am
by jilliana
It could be a sort of 'count' command for containers that can't be worn - handcarts, workcarts, boxes and wagons.
I'll definitely +1. :)
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Sat May 09, 2015 10:26 am
by Fayne
Yeah, I'd definitely like a count command for use on wagons and such.
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Thu May 14, 2015 12:48 pm
by Jirato
You may track the status of your request here:
https://trello.com/c/E7ckTfmW
Right now it is in the backburner/undecided list. I do want to implement it, it's just not a priority at the moment. I will probably be updating the COUNT command rather than implementing an entirely new command.
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 9:06 am
by Jirato
count thing
You have the following items:
a thing (in a folded black leather toolkit) (x2)
(In total, you have 2 matching items.)
EAvd>
rem toolkit
You detach a folded black leather toolkit from your double-buckled black leather utility belt.
EAvd>
drop toolkit
EAvd>
count thing in toolkit
You see the following items:
a thing (in a folded black leather toolkit) (x2)
(In total, you see 2 matching items.)
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:45 pm
by sona
hooray! This will work for crates, barrels, handcarts, wagons and other containers which are on the ground now? This is awesome!
Re: command: check <container> for <object>
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:04 pm
by Fayne
Now all we need is the ability to COUNT for things both on our person and inside containers in the room, gor those moments when you're trying to find something without GETting it for whatever reason. (I'm totally kidding. We don't need to be THAT spoiled.)